2019-06-05 10:21:31
Hft has highlighted that social care staff are being commissioned at significantly lower rates of pay, compared to local authorities, and the Whitehall departments responsible for social care policy.
The evidence gathered by Hft formed its submission to the Low Pay Commission’s annual consultation on the impact of the National Living Wage in the 2018/19 financial year.
The charity’s evidence included answers to Parliamentary Written questions submitted by Wera Hobhouse MP, which revealed that the lowest paid staff in relevant Whitehall departments were paid at significantly higher hourly rates than most social care staff.
The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government paid its staff £13.16 per hour in London and £11.30p/h nationally. At the Department of Health and Social Care, staff were paid at £11.61 p/h in Inner London and £9.41 nationally. Meanwhile, social care was typically commissioned at the National Living Wage of £7.83 p/h.
Billy Davis, Public Affairs and Policy Manager at Hft, commented:
“Our research highlights the unfairness of the enforced low pay model that social care currently operates under. While social care is legislated to be commissioned at the National Living Wage, the Whitehall departments responsible for deciding and implementing social care policy are paying their own staff at significantly higher per-hour rates.
“This enforced low-pay model is having a detrimental effect on the sector. According to our yearly Sector Pulse Check report, 80% of providers in the social care sector cited low pay as their biggest challenge when it comes to recruitment and retention.
“Annual increases in the National Living are, of course, welcome as they see our hardworking staff paid more for the valuable work that they do. However, if the government is serious about making social care a valued and viable career, it needs to do more to address low pay within the sector. This includes providing local authorities with adequate funding to commission social care at a higher, more competitive wage rates.”
Wera Hobhouse, MP for Bath, commented:
“Workers in the social care sector truly are the backbone of our welfare state. I fully support Hft in their work highlighting the financial challenges that workers face. If we are to look after the most vulnerable in our society properly, we need to incentivise those who do it with more than warm words. The sector can’t recruit and retain good staff for difficult jobs if those staff can barely make ends meet. The government must start putting significant amounts of money back in to local authorities, and give communities the resources to look after their vulnerable residents.”
Notes to editors
For further information please email media.enquiries@hft.org.uk
About Hft
Proudly established in 1962 by a group of visionary parents, Hft is a charity supporting more than 2,500 learning disabled adults in England and Wales. Together, we are creating a future where learning disabled people and their families can live the best life possible.
Providing personalised support. Creating solutions for living independently. Coming together to campaign for positive change. Fundraising for new opportunities and a bigger impact.
In 2033, we’ll live in a world where learning disabled people have greater choice. About where they live. The support they need and want. And how to spend their time and money.
Learning disability versus difficulty
A learning disability is different from a learning difficulty but the terms are often confused and used inter-changeably. A learning difficulty does not affect general intellect, whereas a learning disability is a life-long condition characterised by a reduced intellectual ability and struggle with everyday activities.
–
For more information about Hft please visit www.hft.org.uk
